Tuesday, May 13, 2014

Hillary Is Corrupted

Journalist: Hillary Is ‘Banal, Corrupted, Drained Of Vibrancy’ And ‘A F*cking Hawk And Like A Neocon’

May 12, 2014 by  
 643 115
 
 12 1334
Journalist: Hillary Is ‘Banal, Corrupted, Drained Of Vibrancy’ And ‘A F*cking Hawk And Like A Neocon’
UPI FILE

In a recent interview, Glenn Greenwald— the journalist instrumental in helping Edward Snowden leak classified national security documents last year— had some harsh words for Hillary Clinton and Americans likely to support her if she runs for President in 2016.
Greenwald told GQ that he hopes Clinton gets the Democratic nod so that Americans can learn from the mistake of blindly supporting candidates based on their race or sex and allowing the Nation to become a “de facto monarchy”:
The observations were made in response to a question about how he views all of the “early presidential jockeying” leading up to 2016:
Hillary is banal, corrupted, drained of vibrancy and passion. I mean, she’s been around forever, the Clinton circle. She’s a fucking hawk and like a neocon, practically. She’s surrounded by all these sleazy money types who are just corrupting everything everywhere. But she’s going to be the first female president, and women in America are going to be completely invested in her candidacy. Opposition to her is going to be depicted as misogynistic, like opposition to Obama has been depicted as racist. It’s going to be this completely symbolic messaging that’s going to overshadow the fact that she’ll do nothing but continue everything in pursuit of her own power. They’ll probably have a gay person after Hillary who’s just going to do the same thing.
I hope this happens so badly, because I think it’ll be so instructive in that regard. It’ll prove the point. Americans love to mock the idea of monarchy, and yet we have our own de facto monarchy. I think what these leaks did is, they demonstrated that there really is this government that just is the kind of permanent government that doesn’t get affected by election choices and that isn’t in any way accountable to any sort of democratic transparency and just creates its own world off on its own.

1 comment:

  1. Whoa Nellie...! I do not personally know 1 female who would vote for Hillary Clinton. I am a conservative female and I know a lot of people. You said, "...and women in America will be completely invested in her candidacy." That is far too sweeping. Unfortunately a lot of women will vote for her simply because of her gender despite her lack of integrity and competence. Others will vote for her because they are Democrats, despite the fact that their party is treating them like children by giving them only 1 candidate for whom they can cast a Presidential ballot. Still, please do not underestimate the number of women in this country who employ reason, logic & scrutiny to make informed decisions, about everything! V

    ReplyDelete